The AI footage of PM Modi and his mother that the Congress had made public was ordered to be taken down by the Patna High Court on Wednesday. Rahul Gandhi, the Election Commission of India, Meta, Google, X, and the Ministry of Information Technology have all received notices from the court.

Advocates Praveen Kumar, Santosh Kumar, and Sanjay Agrawal filed the petition. They said, “The court directed all concerned agencies to ensure that such content is immediately stopped from being broadcast on all portals and is removed.”

Santosh Kumar, an advocate, contended that false and deceptive videos are being produced and that the prime minister and his mother are the targets of deliberate attacks.

The petitioner, advocate Santosh Kumar, contended that the prime minister and his mother are the targets of deliberate attacks. On the internet, false and disparaging remarks are being circulated.

Taking this seriously, the court has ordered the removal of the tapes and requested a response from the federal and state governments. The video was taken down from the Bihar Congress’s X account following the court’s ruling.

In relation to this, the BJP had previously filed a formal complaint against the Congress in Delhi on September 14.

On September 11, the Bihar Congress posted the AI video on X.
I can research more information on the case to give a more thorough explanation of this news. Would you want to learn more about the precise content of the video that was ordered to be taken down or the in-depth responses from the people who were involved?

PM Modi and his late mother are featured in the AI video produced by the Bihar Congress. It claims that the 36-second video had a dialogue in which the mother criticized the political actions of the prime minister. As a result, the BJP declared the film offensive, claiming it had gone beyond all bounds of political discourse.

The Supreme Court heard arguments on Friday about the ongoing special intense revision, or SIR (voter list verification), in Bihar. The Supreme Court said during the hearing that online applications can be made to add names to the voter list. Physically submitting the form is not required.

The Supreme Court further stated that the Aadhaar card is one of the eleven papers listed in Form 6. These records consist of a water bill, a driver’s licence, and a passbook. September 8 is the day of the case’s next hearing.

Political parties are questioned by the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court questioned the Election Commission on a number of issues throughout the hearing. According to Justice Suryakant, the political parties’ lack of action is unexpected.

Only three of the state’s twelve political parties have made court appearances. How are you assisting the electorate?

The court was reportedly taken aback that political parties had only raised two objections, despite having almost 1.6 lakh booth level agents (BLAs).

BLAs are being appointed by the parties. “Parties are appointing BLAs (booth level agents)…” Why is the gap between political workers and the general people so great? Parties ought to step up and assist the electorate.